Verslag van een ‘duistere’ bestuurscultuur

Hans Siepel, voormalig topambtenaar, schreef in januari jl. een lezenswaardig artikel over de politieke cultuur in Nederland: Uit de memoires van een topambtenaar: verslag van een ‘duistere’ bestuurscultuur.

Zijn observaties sluiten aan bij mijn beeld dat de Nederlandse politieke cultuur gemedialiseerd is. De klassieke media spelen een eigen negatieve rol in het geheel. Het gevolg is onder meer dat er moeilijker goede mensen gevonden kunnen worden voor zowel de ministersploeg als het parlement, met verlaging van de wetgevingskwaliteit als consequentie.

 

 

Eerdere artikelen op dit blog over wetgevingskwaliteit:

Geplaatst in Grondrechten | Tags: , , | Plaats een reactie

Geschillenbeslechtende instantie Kifid druk bezig met verstevigen van haar positie | Wwft, Wft, grondrechten

Private geschillenbeslechtingsinstantie Klachteninstituut Financiële Dienstverlening (Kifid) (site) is druk bezig met het verstevigen van haar positie. Eerder heeft de instantie ook de BKR-geschillenbeslechting aan haar activiteiten toegevoegd.

Eind februari jl. publiceerde Kifid het bericht Onafhankelijke opinie over het beoordelingskader van Kifid. Daarin is vermeld dat op verzoek van Kifid een hoogleraar, O.O. Cherednychenko, hoogleraar Europees privaatrecht en rechtsvergelijking aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, een wetenschappelijke opinie heeft geschreven over het beoordelingskader van Kifid. De opinie kan hier worden gedownload. Kifid meldt over deze opinie in gesprek te zullen gaan met de stakeholders waarmee zij regelmatig overlegt: vertegenwoordigers van consumentenorganisaties, financiële brancheorganisaties, toezichthouders en het ministerie van Financiën.

De rechtsbescherming in de financiële sector: verder zonder Kifid

Het verandert mijn mening over Kifid niet. Ik vind dat Kifid moet verdwijnen en dat voor een adequate rechtsbescherming van alle klanten van financiële instellingen (met name consumenten en mkb) een financiële ombudsman en een gespecialiseerde rechtsgang bij de onafhankelijke rechter nodig zijn. De onderwerpen die tegenwoordig bij Kifid spelen, zoals het Wwft-klantenonderzoek, zwarte lijsten en internationale financiële discriminatie zijn te moeilijk voor deze instantie.

Ik ben nog steeds diep geschokt over het oordeel vol onjuistheden dat de geschillencommissie van het Kifid heeft geveld in de zaak van de Accidental American. Niet alleen werd het standpunt van deze man onjuist in de uitspraak verkeerd weergegeven (kennelijk was de thematiek te moeilijk voor de commissie), ook werd hij op volledig onjuiste gronden voor valsheid in geschrifte veroordeeld (door de kort geding rechter van tafel geveegd, maar helaas was de rechtbank, lees het nieuwsbericht, nodig om tot een goed oordeel te komen).

Ook andere waarnemingen bevestigen mijn beeld dat Kifid niet geschikt is voor haar taken.

Consumentenorganisaties en burgerrechtenorganisaties doen er goed aan bij de overheid aan te dringen op verandering.

Geplaatst in Bankrekening krijgen en behouden, Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, Fraude, witwasbestrijding, Wwft, Grondrechten, Procesrecht, rechtspraak | Tags: , , , | Plaats een reactie

Does PET help respect fundamental rights? | UN, artificial intelligence

The latest holy grail in the digital world, which purports to respect fundamental rights, is known by the acronym ‘PET’. That stands for ‘Privacy-Enhancing Technologies‘.

The UN is working on and with PET. Read the introduction of a webinar in February:

In recent years, almost every government has been faced with very serious challenges, such as the global health pandemic, supply chain disruption, rising energy and food prices, and decreasing household budgets. To handle these crises in the right way, our leaders need the right data at the right time. National statistical offices are tasked to provide these trusted, relevant, timely and high-quality data. Some of the required data are collected by NSOs themselves, such as data from a population census or from household or business surveys. However, to act swiftly on emerging issues, additional secondary data sources are needed such as administrative data (for example, tax records, social security data, health records or customs administration records) or private sector data (for example, mobile phone records or transactional credit card information). All of those data are very sensitive in terms of private information on persons or businesses.

To gain access to the sensitive data while guaranteeing that privacy will be preserved, privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) are receiving increased attention. Whereas legal arrangements on data sharing can lead to unwanted breaches, the promise of PETs is that privacy is guaranteed. If you cannot see the original data at any time, you cannot by accident reveal any original information.

UNBigData

See the website of the UN Committee of Experts on Big Data and Data Science for Official Statistics (UNBigData):

Events:

  • Webinar on Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for Official Statistics (54th Session of the United Nations Statistical Commission. Side Event), 9 February 2023, video.
  • UN PET Lab Open House, held 7 July 2022.

IAPP: UN launches PETs initiative for data anonymization, 27 January 2023.

Geplaatst in Bankrekening krijgen en behouden, English - posts in English on this blog, Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, Fraude, witwasbestrijding, Wwft, Grondrechten, ICT, privacy, e-commerce | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Plaats een reactie

Registration of hosts providing short-term accommodation rental services and related obligations | EU

Europe is working on a proposal on a regulation on data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services.

The regulation will apply to all types of short-term letting of short-term letting of furnished accommodation, provided for remuneration, whether on a professional or non-professional basis. The rules will not apply to hotels etcetera, “as data for these types of accommodation are usually available and well-documented“, neither to campsites and caravan parks.

Reason for the new duties
According to the newest draft proposal the data collection and sharing duties are necessary for public authorities to manage the consequences of short-term accommodation rental services:

While short-term accommodation rental services create many opportunities for guests, hosts and the entire tourism ecosystem, their rapid growth has also triggered concerns and challenges, in particular for local communities and public authorities. One of the main challenges is the lack of reliable information about short-term accommodation rental services, such as the identity of the host, the location where those services are being offered, and their duration, making it difficult for authorities to assess the actual impact of short-term accommodation rental services and develop and enforce appropriate and proportionate policy responses. (…)

Public authorities at national, regional and local level are increasingly taking measures to obtain information from hosts and online short-term rental platforms, by imposing registration schemes and other transparency requirements, including on online short-term rental platforms.

Though the registration and data collection is not intended to serve tax purposes, it will be useful for that too.

Some member state-authorities will collect information about hosts’ activities and obtain activity data from online platforms on a regular basis. The data will also be collected for the compilation of official statistics and other governmental uses. Europe shows itself to be a true data-driven government.

Of course enforcement is not forgotten. Penalties should be “effective, proportionate and dissuasive“, as the European mantra goes. The Commission should be empowered to adopt direct enforcement measures with regard to very large online platforms.

Information to be provided
According the proposal the following information should be provided by the hosts:

(11) Hosts should provide information regarding themselves, the units they offer for short-term accommodation rental services and other necessary information so that the competent authorities know the identity of the host and their contact details, as well as the location, the detailed address (e.g. flat number or land registry), the type (e.g. house, apartment, room, shared room, or relevant category provided in national law) and characteristics of the unit. Where relevant, hosts can also be required to indicate whether they have obtained an authorisation to provide the service as referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2006/123 from the relevant authorities, provided such authorisation requirement is line with Union law. (…) The description of the unit’s characteristics should include an indication of whether the unit is offered in whole or part and whether the host uses the unit for residential purposes as a primary or secondary residence or for other purposes. Hosts should also provide information on the maximum number of bed places that the unit is capable of accommodating.

(12) It should be possible for Member States to require hosts to submit additional information and documentation attesting compliance with requirements established by national law, such as health and safety and consumer protection requirements or other requirements, such as information as to whether the host has obtained the owner’s permission when this is relevant, without preventing the issue of a registration number. Member States can, in particular, in order to ensure equal access and inclusion, require hosts to provide information concerning the accessibility for persons with disabilities of the units offered for short-term accommodation rental services in relation to national or local accessibility requirements. (…)

The competent authorities in the member states may collect additional information:

(18) Competent authorities in Member States which have imposed a requirement on online s term rental platforms to transmit data about hosts’ activities and have registration systems in place should be able to obtain activity data from online platforms on a regular basis. The type of data that may be obtained should be fully harmonised and include information on the number of nights for which a registered unit has been rented, the number of guests the unit was rented for per night, their country of residence, the detailed address of the unit, the registration number and the URL of the listing of the unit. (…) Only online platforms that have effectively facilitated the conclusion of direct transactions between hosts and guests are covered by the obligation to provide the activity data, the registration number and the URL of the listing of the unit, as only those platforms are in a position to collect data, such as on the number of nights for which a unit is rented and the number of guests the unit was rented for per night. (…)

European digital infrastructure will play a role (the Single Digital Entry Point and the Once Only Technical System [*]).

Platforms
The proposal also regulates the position of platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders. Online short-term rental platforms should ensure that services are not offered where no registration number has been provided, in cases where a host declares that such a registration number applies.

Final remark
Europe interferes in detail with this type of activity, raising the question of why the rules – which are quite detailed – also apply to small-scale activities. I would find it more logical if only the large platforms and their hosts were regulated.

[*] In preamble (33) of the proposal the Once Only Technical System as established by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1463 is mentioned. This regulation is setting out technical and operational specifications of the technical system for the cross-border automated exchange of evidence and application of the ‘once-only’ principle in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1724.

 

More information:

Council of the EU – Press release 2 March 2023

Council agrees position on data collection and sharing for short-term accommodation rentals

Ministers for competitiveness agreed today on a negotiating mandate (general approach) for the regulation on data collection and sharing for short-term accommodation rental services, as part of the ongoing efforts to promote a balanced tourism ecosystem within the EU.

This regulation will benefit players of the short-term accommodation rental segment alike: hosts will have an easy registration procedure, platforms will have a single set of rules for the information they have to provide, travellers will be better protected against fraud and authorities will be able to regulate based on accurate and reliable data.
Ebba Busch, Swedish Minister for Energy, Business and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister

Data from online platforms that operate in the short-term accommodation rental market are not currently standardised due to a diversity of rules and different methods established by member states. The Council supports the creation of a data collection and sharing framework at EU level while also including provisions to better take into account the registration systems that are already in place in the member states.

Easier and harmonised system for data collection
Under the new rules, member states that require data from platforms will have to set up a national “single digital entry point” for the transmission of data between online short-term rental platforms and the public authorities.

Every house, apartment or room offered for rent for a limited number of days per year will have a registration number, so that the competent authorities can know the identity of the “host”, i.e. the person that wants to rent the dwelling. The online platforms will have to make reasonable efforts to undertake regular random checks to verify that there are no incorrect declarations of hosts or invalid registration numbers. The treatment of all the information will have to be compliant with European data protection rules.

This will reduce red tape and costs for hosts and platforms while giving authorities the data they need to regulate the activity. This will also create a level playing field with other actors of the tourism sector (such as hotels, hostels or aparthotels) and help combat fraud.

Member states will have to provide the necessary information to allow public authorities, online platforms, hosts and citizens to understand the laws and requirements relating to the provision of short-term accommodation rental services within their territory. Those include registration procedures and requirements concerning access to, and provision of, these services.

Next steps
The general approach agreed today provides the Council presidency with a mandate for starting negotiations with the European Parliament once the latter has established its position.

Background
The rental of apartments, houses, or rooms for short periods of time has become a common form of accommodation for tourists and travellers. Online platforms have boosted the use of these services, which currently amount to nearly one quarter of the total tourist accommodation in the EU. Some member states have implemented different systems of registration that differ in scope, requirements (to be submitted by the hosts or the online platforms), and the level of administration at which the registers are managed (national, regional, or local).
On 5 March 2020, the Commission signed a voluntary agreement with the biggest online platforms for short-time accommodation rental services on data sharing. This has allowed Eurostat to collect data on this activity, but the agreement was not relevant for enforcement.
On 13 July 2022, a coalition for touristic cities, known as the “European cities alliance on short-term holiday rentals”, called on the Commission to propose legislation on registration and data sharing to better control the activities of platforms and hosts at local level.
Finally, on 7 November 2022, the Commission published its proposed regulation on accommodation services. The proposal, for which the Council has today adopted its general approach, is limited to the creation of an easy-to-use registration system with common provisions for establishing registration procedures and is not intended to regulate access to the market.

Visit the meeting page

 

 

Information to be provided by hosts, article 5 of the proposal:

1. When registering pursuant to a registration procedure referred to in Article 4, a host shall submit the following information by way of declaration:

(a) for each unit:
(1) a detailed address of the unit;
(2) the type of unit;
(3) whether the unit is offered as a part or whole of the host’s primary or secondary residence, or for other purposes;
(4) the maximum number of available bed places that the unit accommodates;
(5) whether the unit is subject to, and if so, whether the host has obtained an authorisation to offer short-term rental accommodation services from the relevant authorities, where such authorisation requirement is line with Union law;

(b) where the hosts are natural persons:
(1) their name;
(2) a national identification number or other information allowing the identification of the person(s);
(3) their address(es);
(4) their contact telephone number;
(5) the electronic mail address that the competent authority can use for written communication;

(c) where the hosts are legal persons:
(1) their name;
(2) the national business registration number;
(3) the name of a legal representative;
(4) the registered address of the host that is a legal person;
(5) a contact telephone number of a representative of that legal person;
(6) an electronic mail address that the competent authority can use for written communication.

2. Member States may require that the information submitted pursuant to points 1 to 4 of subparagraph (a) and in subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 1 is accompanied by appropriate supporting documentation. With respect to the information referred to in point 5 of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 1, where the host declares that the unit is subject to authorisation, or where the other information referred to in paragraph 1 allows an automatic determination that an authorisation requirement applies, Member States may request a copy of, or reference to, the authorisation.

3. Where a Member State requires hosts to submit further information and documentation, including information and documentation about the compliance with national, regional or local rules referred to in Article 2.2(a), the submission of that information and documentation is without prejudice to the issuance of the registration number in accordance with Article 4(2), point (b). (…)

 

Duties of platforms, articles 7 and 9 of the proposal:

Article 7 Compliance by design

1. Online short-term rental platforms shall:

(a) design and organise their online interface in a way that requires hosts to self-declare whether the unit offered for short-term accommodation rental services is located in an area where a registration procedure has been established or applies;
(b) where the host declares that the unit offered for short-term accommodation rental services is located in an area where a registration procedure has been established or applies, design and organise their online interface in a way that enables hosts to let users identify the unit through a registration number, and to ensure that hosts have provided a registration number prior to allowing the offering of the short-term accommodation rental services with respect to that unit;
(c) make reasonable efforts to randomly check, including with reasonable regularity, declarations of the hosts concerning the existence or not of a registration procedure, taking into account the list made available pursuant to Article 13(1), point (a), and, where such a procedure exists, the validity of the registration number provided by the host, through the use of the functionalities offered by the Single Digital Entry Points referred to in Article 10(2), point (b), after allowing the offering of the short-term accommodation rental services by the host.

2. Online short-term rental platforms shall inform without undue delay the competent authorities and the hosts of the results of the random checks referred to in paragraph 1, point (c), concerning incorrect declarations of hosts or invalid registration numbers.

3. Online short-term rental platforms shall include, in a specific section of the online interface that is directly and easily accessible, a reference to the information to be made available by Member States pursuant to Article 17(1). (…)

Article 9 Obligation on online short-term rental platforms to transmit activity data and registration numbers

1. When a listing concerns a unit located in an area included in the list referred to in Article 13(1), point (b), providers of online short-term rental platforms shall collect and, on a monthly basis, transmit to the Single Digital Entry Point of the Member State where the unit is located, activity data per unit, together with the corresponding registration number as provided by the host, the detailed address of the unit and the URL of the listing. That transmission shall take place by machine-to-machine communication means. In case of a technical problem affecting the transmission of data by the online short-term rental platforms, the competent authority shall be able to request the online short-term rental platform to resubmit the data in its possession.

2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, small or micro online short-term rental platforms that did not, in the previous quarter, reach a monthly average of 2 500 or more listings shall transmit the activity data per unit, together with the corresponding registration number, the detailed address of the unit and the URL of the listing, at the end of the quarter, by machineto-machine communication means or manually in accordance with national law, to the Single Digital Entry Point of the Member State where the unit is located.

 

 


Addition 28 November 2023
The Commission announced on 16 November 2023: Commission welcomes agreement on new short-term rentals rules to increase transparency in the sector:

Commission welcomes agreement on new short-term rentals rules to increase transparency in the sector
The Commission warmly welcomes the agreement found between the European Parliament and the Council on the short-term accommodation rentals proposal presented almost exactly a year ago. This new Regulation will increase transparency in the sector, with clear rules for hosts and platforms on data collection and sharing. It will provide key information to authorities that wish to address the impact of short-term rentals on local communities. Data sharing obligations for platforms will be adapted to the smallest players. After its entry into force, Member States will have a 24-month period to establish the mechanisms for data exchanges, which are already being prepared with the support of the Commission.

The short-term rentals Regulation will complement the Digital Services Act. A key deliverable for sustainable and smart tourism under the Tourism Transition Pathway, the new legislation will also provide aggregated data that will feed into a European data space for tourism.

Thierry Breton, Commissioner in charge of the Single Market, said: “Tourism is key for our EU economy.  Short-term rentals are an important part of the tourism ecosystem, but shouldn’t come at the expense of local communities. Today’s agreement will enable local authorities to manage short-term rentals in an effective and proportionate way. It will also build on the Digital Services Act and ensure that online rental platforms take their responsibility, share data and help fight illegal listings.”

Geplaatst in English - posts in English on this blog, Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, ICT, privacy, e-commerce | Tags: , , , | Plaats een reactie

Werkplan toezicht advocatuur 2023

Op 28 februari jl. heeft het College van toezicht advocatuur het werkplan 2023 bekend gemaakt. Veel van de inhoud is organisatorisch en geeft de huidige en te verwachten (politiek-)organisatorische ontwikkelingen weer.

Opvallend is dat het College geen aandacht besteedt aan de gevolgen die de toenemende compliance last voor advocaten / NOvA heeft voor de toegankelijkheid van de rechtsbijstand voor consumenten en midden- en kleinbedrijf.

Het is belangrijk, omdat het grootste deel van de advocatuur behoort tot het midden- en kleinbedrijf (zie bijvoorbeeld dit artikel dat spreekt over 57% eenpersoonskantoren en 29% van de kantoren bestaand uit 2 tot en met 4 advocaten, dat zal niet veranderd zijn).

Criminaliteitsbestrijding door de advocatuur
In hoofdstuk 3 wordt op de ontwikkelingen ingegaan en passeren de bekende criminaliteitsbestrijdingsthema’s zoals Wwft de revue. Over de sanctieregels tegen de Russische Federatie wordt opgemerkt:

Advocaten moeten zich – net als ieder ander houden aan de sancties. In dat kader is van belang dat zij hun bedrijfsvoering dusdanig op orde hebben zodat zij de sanctiemaatregelen kunnen naleven. Mede gezien de complexiteit van bepaalde sancties is dit een aandachtspunt voor advocatenkantoren naast naleving van andere integriteitswet- en regelgeving zoals de Wwft.

Ik blijf het overigens raadselachtig vinden welk rol advocaten hier zouden hebben nu ze – anders dan bijvoorbeeld banken – geen vermogen van gesanctioneerde personen onder zich hebben.

 

Meer informatie:

Geplaatst in Dienstverlening - juridisch financieel [advocaten, accountants, belastingadviseurs e.d.], Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, Fraude, witwasbestrijding, Wwft | Tags: , , | Plaats een reactie

Parlementair dieptepunt: aangenomen motie over not-for-profit organisaties | rechtsstaat

De Tweede Kamer bracht vorige maand door middel van een motie een doodsteek toe aan alle burgerrechtenorganisaties [1] én toonde aan dat bij de leden van de Kamer sprake is van stuitende onkunde inzake de rechtsstaat.

De motie [2] luidt:

overwegende dat het ondernemen van juridische acties door belangenorganisaties op grond van artikel 3:305a van het Burgerlijk Wetboek mogelijk is vanuit specifieke belangen, met grote consequenties voor het algemeen belang, terwijl de representativiteit van deze organisaties buitengewoon gering kan zijn;
overwegende dat voor het vereiste van representativiteit van de belangenclub het van belang is dat een financiële bijdrage wordt gevraagd van de personen tot bescherming van wier belangen de rechtsvordering strekt;
constaterende dat er onder de huidige regeling geen indringende toets op de representativiteit door de rechter lijkt te worden toegepast;
constaterende dat belangenorganisaties die rechtszaken tegen de Staat aanspannen op grond van artikel 3:305a van het Burgerlijk Wetboek overwegend door anderen dan de direct belanghebbenden, mogelijk zelfs met subsidie, kunnen worden gefinancierd;
verzoekt de regering te onderzoeken op welke wijze een indringender toets op de representativiteit van belangenorganisaties binnen het huidige artikel 3:305a BW gerealiseerd kan worden

 

De indieners onderschatten de rol van de rechter bij de beoordeling van door burgerrechtenorganisaties aangespannen rechtszaken.

Het College voor de Rechten van de Mens reageerde meteen:

 

 

Burgerrechtenorganisaties zijn van belang als overheid en grote bedrijven de regels aan de laars lappen

Overheden en bedrijven die regelgeving aan hun laars lappen zijn terecht bezorgd over burgerrechtenorganisatie die hen tot naleving proberen te bewegen. Zulke organisaties en de fondsen die hen financieren zijn nodig omdat particulieren niet altijd hun nek willen uitsteken en in de media komen als slachtoffer van een nalatige overheid of nalatige bedrijven en omdat individuen niet voldoende middelen hebben om zich te weer te stellen tegen grote partijen.

Ook banken zijn bang om ter verantwoording te worden geroepen, zo bleek vorig jaar uit een bericht op de site van de Europese brancheorganisatie van banken, de European Banking Federation (EBF) over een gezamenlijke verklaring van een aantal brancheorganisaties uit de financiële sector en andere bedrijfssectoren over de financiering van tegen hen gerichte procedures [3].

 

Stemadvies

Mijn stemadvies voor de komende verkiezingen luidt: stem niet op één van de partijen die vóór deze motie heeft gestemd:

 

 

Noten
[1] De berichtgeving suggereerde dat het alleen om milieuorganisaties ging. Dat klopt niet, het gaat over alle burgerrechtenorganisaties.
[2] De motie is hier te vinden.
[3] Joint statement on Responsible Private Funding of Litigation, 22 juni 2022.

Geplaatst in Grondrechten, Not-for-profit | Tags: , | 1 reactie

Unmasking of AI fantasists | AlgorithmWatch

AlgorithmWatch in this edition of its newsletter it discusses the article Learning machine learning: On the political economy of big tech’s online AI courses and comments:

Both courses take a very uncritical view of Machine Learning, sometimes veering on the laughable.

The abstract of the article:

Machine learning (ML) algorithms are still a novel research object in the field of media studies. While existing research focuses on concrete software on the one hand and the socio-economic context of the development and use of these systems on the other, this paper studies online ML courses as a research object that has received little attention so far. By pursuing a walkthrough and critical discourse analysis of Google’s Machine Learning Crash Course and IBM’s introductory course to Machine Learning with Python, we not only shed light on the technical knowledge, assumptions, and dominant infrastructures of ML as a field of practice, but also on the economic interests of the companies providing the courses. We demonstrate how the online courses further support Google and IBM to consolidate and even expand their position of power by recruiting new AI talent and by securing their infrastructures and models to become the dominant ones. Further, we show how the companies not only influence greatly how ML is represented, but also how these representations in turn influence and direct current ML research and development, as well as the societal effects of their products. Here, they boast an image of fair and democratic artificial intelligence, which stands in stark contrast to the ubiquity of their corporate products and the advertised directives of efficiency and performativity the companies strive for. This underlines the need for alternative infrastructures and perspectives.

It shows the need to take a critical look at the bright future being painted to us by IT vendors.

Geplaatst in English - posts in English on this blog, ICT, privacy, e-commerce | Tags: , , , , | 1 reactie

The man who won’t stop filing info requests until every EU doc is public | Europa

The legislation process in Europe is highly non-transparent. A former European Parliament official and lawyer, Mr. Emilio De Capitani, is campaigning on more transparency, read the EUObserver article. More transparency is not only interesting to see what the EU countries’ national positions were. It is also important for regulatory interpretation.

Geplaatst in English - posts in English on this blog, Europa | Plaats een reactie

Antwoord op vragen over renseignering van zzp-gegevens

Met renseignering worden de informatiediensten van bedrijven aan de overheid aangeduid. Bekende voorbeelden zijn:

  • werkgevers – die financiële gegevens van hun werknemers aan de fiscus leveren ten behoeve van de belastingheffing bij de werknemers;
  • banken – die opgave doen van onder meer de rekeningsaldi ten behoeve van de aangifte inkomstenbelasting van particulieren.

Het aantal partijen dat renseigneringsverplichtingen heeft, neemt steeds verder toe, wat soms privacy- en cybersecurityrisico’s voor betrokkenen oplevert [*]. Ik zie renseignering als onderdeel van financiële privacy (financiële grondrechten) en schrijf er regelmatig over op dit blog.

Renseignering en zzp’ers in de zorg
Recent werden vragen uit de Tweede Kamer beantwoord over renseignering in de zorg. De vragen betroffen de renseigneringsplicht ‘Uitbetaalde Bedragen aan Derden’ (UBD). De vragensteller vroeg zich af waarom er een renseigneringsplicht is, terwijl een btw-vrijstelling van toepassing is op de ingehuurde zzp’ers.
De minister en staatssecretaris leggen uit dat Belastingdienst de informatie gebruikt voor het vooraf invullen van de aangifte en als contra-informatie:


Andere vragen gaan over de administratieve lasten die de renseigneringsverplichting oplevert.

 

[*] Bijvoorbeeld bij digitale platformen.

 

Meer informatie:

Geplaatst in Belastingrecht, Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, Fraude, witwasbestrijding, Wwft, ICT, privacy, e-commerce | Tags: , | 1 reactie

De banken hebben geen fysieke kantoren meer | antwoorden op kamervragen

Terwijl banken er steeds meer overheidstaken bij krijgen, verdwijnen de fysieke kantoren in hoge snelheid en wordt de kwaliteit van de dienstverlening steeds minder.

Onlangs gaf de minister van Financiën antwoord op vragen uit de Tweede Kamer over de transformatie van banken naar digitale dienstverleners, onder de titel ‘Bankkantoren met een loep zoeken: ABN heeft er nog maar 27’. Volgens de minister is er niets aan de hand en blijven banken fysieke dienstverlening verrichten en schrijft onder meer:

Naar aanleiding van het hiervoor genoemde DNB-rapport hebben de Nederlandse Vereniging van Banken en de Betaalvereniging Nederland namens de vier grootbanken een statement gepubliceerd [5] . Hierin spreken zij een versterkt commitment uit om de toegankelijkheid van het betalingsverkeer te verbeteren, garanderen zij dat niet-digitale klanten gebruik kunnen blijven maken van nietdigitale basisbankdiensten, zo lang als dat nodig is, en kondigen zij een aantal acties aan, zowel op de korte als lange termijn, om de toegankelijkheid te verbeteren.

[5] ‘Commitment van banken voor beter toegankelijk betalingsverkeer’, te raadplegen via: Commitment van banken voor beter toegankelijk betalingsverkeer (nvb.nl)

Communicatie is moeilijk voor banken

In de vragen en antwoorden ontbreekt dat communicatie per post met banken grote problemen oplevert (soms komt post niet aan, raakt weg of wordt geweigerd). Sommige banken bieden voor digitale communicatie over vertrouwelijke gegevens (zoals het Wwft-cliëntenonderzoek) alleen e-mail en beschikken niet over een beveiligd kanaal.

Op communicatief gebied behoren banken zelf tot de kwetsbare groepen (kwetsbare groepen van een andere soort zijn een belangrijk thema in de antwoorden).

Geplaatst in Bankrekening krijgen en behouden, Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, Fraude, witwasbestrijding, Wwft, Grondrechten, ICT, privacy, e-commerce | Tags: , , , , , | Plaats een reactie