AlgorithmWatch in this edition of its newsletter it discusses the article Learning machine learning: On the political economy of big tech’s online AI courses and comments:
Both courses take a very uncritical view of Machine Learning, sometimes veering on the laughable.
The abstract of the article:
Machine learning (ML) algorithms are still a novel research object in the field of media studies. While existing research focuses on concrete software on the one hand and the socio-economic context of the development and use of these systems on the other, this paper studies online ML courses as a research object that has received little attention so far. By pursuing a walkthrough and critical discourse analysis of Google’s Machine Learning Crash Course and IBM’s introductory course to Machine Learning with Python, we not only shed light on the technical knowledge, assumptions, and dominant infrastructures of ML as a field of practice, but also on the economic interests of the companies providing the courses. We demonstrate how the online courses further support Google and IBM to consolidate and even expand their position of power by recruiting new AI talent and by securing their infrastructures and models to become the dominant ones. Further, we show how the companies not only influence greatly how ML is represented, but also how these representations in turn influence and direct current ML research and development, as well as the societal effects of their products. Here, they boast an image of fair and democratic artificial intelligence, which stands in stark contrast to the ubiquity of their corporate products and the advertised directives of efficiency and performativity the companies strive for. This underlines the need for alternative infrastructures and perspectives.
It shows the need to take a critical look at the bright future being painted to us by IT vendors.
Afgezien van politieke motieven vraag ik mij af of we eigenlijk wel kunnen spreken van intelligentie. Voor mij gaat het gewoon om een techniek die “datamining”heet. Een techniek die speurt naar correlaties binnen een pool aan data. Dat is gewoon brute force en heeft met intelligentie niks te maken. Die opschepperij zou je ook kunnen plaatsen binnen politieke beïnvloeding. Het moet vele oohs en aahs opleveren onder een onwetend publiek dat maar al te graag met open mond de vorderingen der techniek bewondert. Binnen niet al te lange tijd zal de paradijselijke samenleving zich openbaren. Weg het lijden en verdriet. Waar hebben we die boodschap eerder gehoord.