Europe persists with ‘open finance’ despite criticism from citizens and despite major cybersecurity risks | European financial data access and payments package

Though there was criticism from citizens and NGOs, Europe is proceeding with its ‘open finance‘ plans, promising citizens they will get a “wider range of better and cheaper financial products and services“.
In reality, the proposals are only in the interests of certain sections of the business community and there is a high risk that all the benefits will end up with the well-known big US tech companies.

Commission proposals
The European Commission recently presented its financial data access and payments package, consisting of:

  • Proposal for a Regulation on a framework for financial data access (FIDA Regulation, this is the open finance proposal)
  • Proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the internal market (PSR)
  • Proposal for a Directive on payment services and electronic money services in the internal market (PSD3)

Open finance represents the European desire for all account holders to open up their account data (which contains very large amounts of third-party personal data) to fintech companies, which can use the wisdom they extract from the transaction data to create “innovative” products. The major problems with cybersecurity are mentioned as a concern but are not seriously addressed in the European proposals.

As with PSD2, there is a lack of attention to the fact that payment transaction data includes data of third parties (‘silent third parties’) who have not given their consent for their personal data to be processed.

The European Commission is not taking data protection seriously
Even if there is a verbal commitment to data protection, the reality at the Commission is different.
Read for instance the article by noyb, a NGO that is defending data protection rights of Europeans, on the press conference held by EU Commissioner Didier Reynders. This Commissioner used the official press conference of the European Commission to discredit the work of civil rights organizations like noyb:

Commissioner Reynders used his time on stage to (for the third time) make the allegation that citizens and “non-profits” bring cases before the CJEU as a “business model”. This is an unacceptable attack on the important work of civil rights organizations

Open finance
There is every reason to pay close attention to the European Commission’s open finance proposals.

 

More information:

General information on the financial data access and payments package (European Commission):

FIDA Regulation (draft for an open finance regulation)

PSR and PSD3 (drafts regarding the European payments system)

Onbekend's avatar

About Ellen Timmer

Weblog: https://ellentimmer.com/ ||| Microblog: https://mastodon.nl/@ellent ||| Motto: goede bedoelingen rechtvaardigen geen slechte regels
Dit bericht werd geplaatst in English - posts in English on this blog, Europa, Financieel recht, onder meer Wft, Wtt, Fraude, witwasbestrijding, Wwft, Grondrechten, ICT, privacy, e-commerce, Not-for-profit en getagd met , , , , , , , , , . Maak de permalink favoriet.

1 Response to Europe persists with ‘open finance’ despite criticism from citizens and despite major cybersecurity risks | European financial data access and payments package

  1. Ellen Timmer's avatar Ellen Timmer schreef:

    In het FD verscheen eind juni het artikel ‘Big tech houdt toch onbeperkt toegang tot bankrekeningen Europese burgers‘ (betaalmuur), waarin de indiening van de voorstellen van de Commissie worden besproken. Intro:

    Grote techbedrijven mogen voorlopig doen wat ze willen met de financiële gegevens van Europese consumenten. De Europese Commissie presenteerde woensdag een aantal voorstellen om het betaalverkeer efficiënter te maken en consumenten meer inzicht te geven in hun uitgavenpatroon. Big tech wordt daarbij geen duimbreed in de weg gelegd.

Plaats een reactie