Preventing harm by digital tools and AI in the jusitice field | EU Justice ministers

The European Justice ministers in October discussed digital challenges for justice in Europe. In a statement the French Presidency of the Committee of Ministers declares the following:

4. Recalls the need to take into account the following principles when developing Council of Europe tools and instruments for justice and digital technology:
i. Digital access to law and justice should supplement non-digital access. In particular, digital access must support better understanding of the law, better access to court rulings, better knowledge of these rulings and sound understanding of these rulings by citizens and legal professionals.
ii. The use of digital tools and algorithms in the justice field must not have any discriminatory effect on individuals, and must guarantee respect for privacy and the right to data protection.
iii. Although the use of digital tools and algorithms offers new options for alternative dispute settlement and aids to decision-making, it should not affect the right to effective access to a judge and judicial oversight, or the right to individualised court rulings.
iv. The use of digital tools should respect the right to a fair trial and the secrecy of investigations, and comply with requirements for transparent and intelligible court rulings.
v. The use of these tools should prevent the spread of illegal content and fake news, which have a serious impact on our democratic societies, while guaranteeing freedom of expression and information.

The European association of lawyers, Council of Bars & Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) expresses enthousiasm:

 

Harmful digitalisation
It is becoming very clear that digital systems may harm human rights and that it is als happening in Europe, read the announcement by the UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights of an analysis in regard of the Dutch System Risk Indication (SyRI): The Netherlands is building a surveillance state for the poor, says UN rights expert. The Rapporteur also published a report on counter-terrorism (read this), showing the harm already done and the grave risks of even more damage occurring.

The harm of digital surveillance and digital systems is not limited to the people the Rapporteur concentrated on. It might harm all citizens of Europe and might harm small and medium companies and organisations as well. The first signs of that are already there.

Read for instance:

 

 

More information:

 

Over Ellen Timmer, advocaat ondernemingsrecht @Pellicaan

Verbonden aan Pellicaan Advocaten, http://www.pellicaan.nl/, kantoor Rotterdam, telefoon 088-6272287, fax 088-6272280, e-mail ellen.timmer@pellicaan.nl ||| Weblogs: algemeen: https://ellentimmer.com/ || modernisering ondernemingsrecht: http://flexbv.wordpress.com/ ||| Motto: goede bedoelingen rechtvaardigen geen slechte regels
Dit bericht werd geplaatst in English - posts in English on this blog, Europa, Grondrechten, rechtsstaat e.d., ICT, privacy, e-commerce en getagged met , , , , , . Maak dit favoriet permalink.

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Google photo

Je reageert onder je Google account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s